Sunday, May 19, 2013

Syria: Obama's real Headache?

Syria could be Obama's real headache

Politico - ‎41 minutes ago‎
A trifecta of domestic headaches confronts President Obama these days. They've shaken his self-confidence, thrown his second-term agenda off track, and given Republicans seemingly endless opportunities to hammer him.
On 'Scandals', President Obama Should Borrow From An Unfamiliar Playbook ...
Obama Approval Ratings Hold Strong After Recent Scandals
Americans' Attention to IRS, Benghazi Stories Below Average - Gallup.Com
Top Obama adviser stakes out defiant defense on IRS, Benghazi, AP scandals

Syria could be Obama's real headache

Barack Obama is pictured. | AP Photo
America’s options are terrible, the author writes. | AP Photo
A trifecta of domestic headaches confronts President Obama these days. They’ve shaken his self-confidence, thrown his second-term agenda off track, and given Republicans seemingly endless opportunities to hammer him.
And yet a fourth headache looms not at home; but abroad, a migraine really, potentially more painful than the rest.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset
Unlike the IRS, Associated Press, and Benghazi stories, the Syrian crisis will not run out the media cycle; it’s going to continue to hound the president, threatening to draw America in.
And unlike his domestic travails, where the president has some latitude to do damage control, the Syrian civil war offers up no good options.
So far, the president has willfully and wisely tried to avoid militarizing America’s role there. But the course he’s chosen now – trying diplomacy with the Russians — may paradoxically accelerate the very military option he’s trying to avoid.
Traditionally, a second-term president has seen foreign policy as an area of potential opportunity when his domestic agenda gets bogged down by Congress or even scandal. Using Henry Kissinger, President Nixon did remarkable Middle East diplomacy during Watergate.
That’s not likely to be Obama’s story. Abroad, particularly in the Middle East, he confronts nothing but the stuff of root canals. An Arab Spring headed south; an Iran in search of a nuclear weapons capacity, and an Israeli-Palestinian conflict now at an impasse.
Right now Syria is the most kinetic and dangerous of them all. With 80,000 dead, several million refugees, Israeli-Syrian confrontation looming, chemical weapons already deployed, Syria’s civil war shows only signs of getting worse. The Assad regime, buffered by Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, continues to hang on; and the rebels – however inchoate and unorganized - won’t give in either.
America’s options are terrible: doing nothing is unacceptable and the limited steps the administration has taken, including non-lethal assistance and intelligence sharing to support the rebels, have proven ineffective. The president has shied away from providing weapons or creating a no-fly zone, let alone directly intervening with missile strikes because he rightly wonders what the end game will be. Indeed, in the wake of Afghanistan and Iraq, Obama knows that getting into these kind of conflicts is easier than getting out. And he doesn’t want to America stuck with the check.
The president’s domestic travails are worrisome. But at least he can act: firing the head of the IRS; releasing emails related to Benghazi; moving to create a national shield law to protect the press. If the IRS story doesn’t get worse, the scandals will burn themselves out, though together they raise competency issues and give the Republicans and the tea party in particular a second wind.

I have always felt that McCain's point of view that we need to change the military situation in Syria was a little disingenious coming from a Republican. It's not that McCain doesn't believe this, it is that this is what we would have done in the 1980s,1970s, 1960s, or 1950s. But not what we can financially afford to do in the 20 teens, especially after the disastrous Sequester which gutted not only Social Programs but also the Pentagon and the military in regard to general readiness and after a war in Iraq and Now Afghanistan that never seems to end since 2001. So, even though what McCain advocates we Would have done from the 1950s through the 1980s and maybe even the 1990s like we did during the Balkans War, it is not what we can actually financially afford to do now as a country. 

It's like saying, "I'd really like that Cadillac there" when you really know the only new thing you actually could afford to drive might be a new Toyota Prius.

So, even though the right thing to do morally would be to create a no-fly zone there, we also risk a protracted war with Iran and Russia and even Hezbollah and God knows who else if we go in there. Obama is doing what he must to protect U.S. interests. And U.S. interests now, are to balance the Federal Budget with Cuts so we don't go down under too much debt from 12 years of constant war.

No comments: