Scientific American
Flame Retardants Linked to Lower IQs, Hyperactivity in Children
By Dina Fine Maron | Scientific American – 7 hrs ago
Almost a decade after manufacturers stopped using certain chemical
flame retardants in furniture foam and
carpet padding,
many of the compounds
still lurk in homes. New work to be presented today reaffirms that the
chemicals may also still be hurting young children who were exposed
before they were born.
Researchers investigating the health impacts of prenatal exposure to
flame retardants collected blood samples from 309 pregnant women early
in their second trimester. Spikes in the levels of one class of flame
retardant,
polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) correlated with behavior and cognition difficulties during early childhood.
The researchers tracked children through the first five years of their lives, looking at a battery of tests for
IQ and behavior. They found that children of mothers who had high
PBDE
levels during their second trimester showed cognition deficits when the
children were five years old as well as higher rates of hyperactivity
at ages two to five. If the mother’s blood had a 10-fold increase in
PBDEs, the average five-year-old had about a four-point IQ deficit. “A
four-point IQ difference in an individual child may not be perceivable
in…ordinary life. However, in a population, if many children are
affected, the social and economic impact can be huge due to the shift of
IQ distribution and productivity,” says lead author
Aimin Chen, an assistant professor of
environmental health at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. The findings, based on women and children from Cincinnati, will be
presented
May 6 at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies in
Washington, D.C. The unpublished results have been submitted to a
peer-reviewed journal, but the paper has not yet been accepted.
Chen’s team did not track the children’s PBDE blood levels after they
were born, so the deficits could also have resulted, at least in part,
from the additional exposures to the chemical that the children
encountered directly after they were born. Chen says that although the
lack of blood level data in the children is a limitation, other
researchers have measured both mother and child PBDE levels and found
similar deficits, strengthening his conclusions. The team also found
that association of PBDEs and child IQ and behavior did not result from
the mother’s
blood levels of lead, a well-known neurotoxic metal.
Although preliminary, Chen’s findings are similar to two recent large U.S. studies that showed associations between prenatal
exposure
to flame retardants and developmental deficits and reduced IQ. One of
those earlier studies, from the University of California, Berkeley,
looked at children and PBDE levels through age seven, and was
published online last fall in
Environmental Health Perspectives.
That study measured PBDEs both in pregnant women and in the children
themselves. It showed that there is a relationship between high PBDE
exposures in utero and deficits in children’s IQ, fine motor function
and attention. Though suggestive, none of the studies have proved a
definitive cause-and-effect link in humans, however.
Scientists believe that in humans PBDEs can lodge themselves in bodily
lipids when contaminated air is inhaled or tainted dust swallowed,
although exactly how they may wreak havoc inside the body remains
unknown. Tests on animals suggest that the chemicals disrupt the
endocrine system. The chemical structure of PBDEs strongly resembles
thyroid hormones, and they affect thyroid regulation and decrease the
level of thyroid hormones in the blood of animals. These hormones drive
growth and development—in particular, brain development. Animal studies
have also found that exposure to PBDEs in the womb and via nursing may
damage the thyroid system and alter newborns’ brains.
Children are considered to be at particular risk of encountering
hazardous dust because they spend so much time close to the floor and
often put their hands in their mouths. Moreover, “you are having an
impact during critical windows of development, and if you mess up
development when brain structures or neuropathways are forming there may
not be an ability to repair them later on,” says Linda Birnbaum,
director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. “We
don’t have data on whether or not the cognitive or behavioral impacts
will reverse. We know from many other exposures to different kinds of
environmental compounds that impact behavior or intelligence that [the
impact] doesn’t go away.” Chen plans to follow the kids in his study for
the next few years to help glean any long-term effects.
The particular flame retardants investigated in Chen’s study, which
were typically used in polyurethane foams and carpet pads, were
phased out of manufacturing in 2004, but they are still on old furniture, remain in the atmosphere and settle into dust in the home.
Furniture-makers have continued to use flame retardants because of a
state law—the California Technical Bulletin 117. It says the furniture
sold within state borders must withstand a 12-second exposure to a small
flame without igniting. That state regulation has become the de facto
law of the land as manufacturers have sought to comply with it so they
can sell their wares throughout the U.S. But California is revising its
standard so that products will only have
to pass a “smolder test” that would prevent fires but would not require flame retardant use in manufacturing. State legislators may finalize
the revision later this summer or in the fall.
Products treated with PBDE are not labeled as such, but Chen says
parents can take precautions to reduce exposure by having children wash
their hands to diminish dust ingestion, and by replacing old furniture
and changing old carpet padding.
Follow Scientific American on Twitter @SciAm and @SciamBlogs.
Visit ScientificAmerican.com for the latest in science, health and technology news.
end quote from:
No comments:
Post a Comment